Your repo, real tasks
Evaluation tasks built from real work in your codebase — bug fixes, multi-file changes, refactors, and features — not generic public benchmarks.
Tensor Cortex helps engineering teams evaluate coding agents on their own codebase — with hidden tests, sandboxed runs, repeatable scoring, and regression gates — so you know which agent to trust, and where not to.
Private release gate
Evaluation tasks built from real work in your codebase — bug fixes, multi-file changes, refactors, and features — not generic public benchmarks.
Private coding-agent evaluation on a customer's own repo: hidden tests, sandboxed execution, repeatable scoring, and regression gates.
Every verdict is backed by the task, base commit, diff, verifier output, and a failure taxonomy — reproducible artifacts, not a one-off demo.
The agent's self-report is never the score. Hidden tests and verifiers decide pass or fail, runs are isolated and content-addressed, and your code never leaves your machine.
Most teams choose coding agents using public benchmarks, demos, or vibes. Private EvalOps answers the sharper question: which agent setup actually works on your codebase?
Bug fixes, multi-file changes, refactors, and feature tasks derived from real repo work.
The same tasks across Codex, Claude Code, Cursor-style agents, open-weight models, or internal loops.
Hidden tests and verifiers decide pass/fail. The agent's self-report is never the score.
Re-run the suite whenever prompts, tools, models, or guardrails change.
Private EvalOps is a private SWE-bench for your own repository. Tensor Cortex builds evaluation tasks from real work in your codebase, runs coding agents against them in a sandbox, and grades pass/fail with hidden tests and verifiers so you get evidence instead of vibes about which agent setup actually works on your code.
Public benchmarks measure performance on open repositories that models may have seen during training. Private EvalOps measures performance on your codebase, with your conventions, your test suite, and tasks that reflect the work your team actually does — the question that decides procurement.
The same private task suite can be run across Codex, Claude Code, Cursor-style agents, open-weight models, and internal agent loops. Because every agent runs the identical tasks under the same sandbox and verifiers, the comparison is fair and repeatable.
Hidden tests and verifiers decide pass or fail — the agent's own self-report is never the score. Runs are sandboxed and content-addressed, and verification can run network-off, so results are reproducible rather than one-off demos.
A first pilot is a fixed-scope evaluation engagement, not a subscription — typically 10–20 private repo tasks across 2–3 agents for $3k–$5k. A deeper custom suite runs $7.5k–$15k, and an ongoing monthly regression gate is $2k–$10k per month.
Yes. Your source code and hidden tests stay on your machine — runs are local-first and nothing is uploaded by default. You receive the evidence package: per-agent pass/fail, diffs, verifier output, and a failure taxonomy.
A repeatable task suite plus an evidence package: pass/fail scores per agent, configuration, git SHA, eval hashes, and failure notes — enough to make a confident decision and to catch regressions whenever prompts, tools, models, or guardrails change.